<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Things That Won&#8217;t Help With  SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cameronolthuis.com/2005/12/5-things-that-wont-help-with-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cameronolthuis.com/2005/12/5-things-that-wont-help-with-seo/</link>
	<description>Surfer and Internet Entrepreneur</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:33:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.cameronolthuis.com/2005/12/5-things-that-wont-help-with-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 17:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameronolthuis.com/?p=20#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care for the term &quot;natural linking&quot; with regards to SEO. There&#039;s really no such thing. If natural linking is what people do that don&#039;t know anything about SEO, then it is making a links page and putting a bunch of unrelated links in it. Directories are natural links and they just have categories and lists of links to sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care for the term &#8220;natural linking&#8221; with regards to SEO. There&#8217;s really no such thing. If natural linking is what people do that don&#8217;t know anything about SEO, then it is making a links page and putting a bunch of unrelated links in it. Directories are natural links and they just have categories and lists of links to sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignat</title>
		<link>http://www.cameronolthuis.com/2005/12/5-things-that-wont-help-with-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2005 03:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cameronolthuis.com/?p=20#comment-15</guid>
		<description>All valid points. After the latest Jagger update Google started leaning towards more &quot;natural&quot; sites. In other words, websites involved in link exchanges suffered the most while naturally acquired links boosted certain sites up the SERPs ladder.

I also heard some rumors that Google began to pay more attention to content surrounding anchor text. Seems to me that algorithm is getting more and more advanced as we go on. Can&#039;t wait for the next Google update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All valid points. After the latest Jagger update Google started leaning towards more &#8220;natural&#8221; sites. In other words, websites involved in link exchanges suffered the most while naturally acquired links boosted certain sites up the SERPs ladder.</p>
<p>I also heard some rumors that Google began to pay more attention to content surrounding anchor text. Seems to me that algorithm is getting more and more advanced as we go on. Can&#8217;t wait for the next Google update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
